Legal Opinion
Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Locals Nos. 70, 85, & 315, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpersd
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 18, 1975No. 73-3221PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Before BARNES and CHOY, Circuit Judges, and EAST, District Judge.* PER CURIAM:
For the reasons stated in the opinion of Judge Peckham filed in the district court which we incorporate herein by appendix, we affirm the judgment below.
APPENDIX
In the United States District Court Northern District of California
Defendant union locals are parties to a collective bargaining agreement with Santa Fe Trail Transportation Co. (“Trail”), a motor carrier, dealing in part with the loading and unloading of trailers or vans. Trail in turn has an oral contract with Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe R. Co.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- San Diego Building Trades Council v. GarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Amalgamated Ass'n of Street, Electric Railway & Motor Coach Employees of America v. LockridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Marydale Products Company, Inc. v. United Packinghouse Workers of America, Afl-CioCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
3Cited by8 opinions
- Castaneda v. Dura-Vent Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Julius Mullins v. Kaiser Steel CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
- Brown & Root, Inc. v. Louisiana State Afl-Cio and Baton Rouge Building & Construction Trades CouncilCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- John S. Griffith Construction Co. v. Southern California Cement Masons Negotiating CommitteeDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1984
- Brown & Root, Inc. v. Louisiana State AFL-CIOCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.