Legal Opinion

Blankenship v. Blankenship

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 19, 1951No. 90PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDevin, C. J.

Tenancy by the curtesy is a development of the common law and in North Carolina the rights of the husband, and limitations thereon, are declared and defined by statute Gr.S. 52-16. It is a right which the husband may forfeit by specified acts of misconduct or which he may release by a separation agreement. Thompson v. Wiggins, 109 N.C. 508, 14 S.E. 301; Garrett v. Kirtley, 97 W. Va. 484; 35 A.L.R. 1526; 49 A.L.R. 148; 15 A. J. 148; 25 C.J.S. 54. A release by the husband of his right of tenancy by the curtesy in his wife’s lands by properly executed contract with his wife is expressly…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Foil v. Newsome.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  2. Powell v. . WoodcockSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  3. Hass v. . HassSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  4. Garrett v. KirtleyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Thompson v. . WigginsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hagler v. HaglerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
  2. Turner v. TurnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  3. Hagler v. HaglerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API