Deace v. Stribling
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
BLAIR, Justice.
Appellee, W. F. Stribling, sued appellant, R. A. Deace, to cancel a mineral lease because of alleged breaches of its covenants and conditions; and on the trial to *565the court without a jury judgment was rendered for appellee as prayed; hence this appeal.
Appellee was lessor, and appellant, R. A. Deace, and W. P. Bankston, Clifford F. York, and Patsey L. York were lessees; each lessee owning a certain percentage of interest ' in the entire mineral estate granted. In 1938, all of the lessees, except appellant, executed a quitclaim deed to their interests to appellee. In 1936, W. P.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- The Texas Company v. DavisTexas Supreme Court · 1923
- Texas Co. v. DavisTexas Supreme Court · 1923
- Durst v. DaughertyTexas Supreme Court · 1891
- Cheek, Guardian v. HerndonTexas Supreme Court · 1891
- Stephenson v. CallihamCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Vinson Minerals, Ltd. v. XTO Energy, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2010
- Coastal Oil & Gas Corp. v. Roberts, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2000
- Lancaster v. Boatright (In Re Grable)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1980
- Fuller v. Rainbow Resources, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1987
- Deace v. StriblingCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1942
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.