Legal Opinion

Deace v. Stribling

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided July 24, 1940No. 8950PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BLAIR, Justice.

Appellee, W. F. Stribling, sued appellant, R. A. Deace, to cancel a mineral lease because of alleged breaches of its covenants and conditions; and on the trial to *565the court without a jury judgment was rendered for appellee as prayed; hence this appeal.

Appellee was lessor, and appellant, R. A. Deace, and W. P. Bankston, Clifford F. York, and Patsey L. York were lessees; each lessee owning a certain percentage of interest ' in the entire mineral estate granted. In 1938, all of the lessees, except appellant, executed a quitclaim deed to their interests to appellee. In 1936, W. P.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. The Texas Company v. DavisTexas Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Texas Co. v. DavisTexas Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Durst v. DaughertyTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Cheek, Guardian v. HerndonTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Stephenson v. CallihamCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Vinson Minerals, Ltd. v. XTO Energy, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2010
  2. Coastal Oil & Gas Corp. v. Roberts, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2000
  3. Lancaster v. Boatright (In Re Grable)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1980
  4. Fuller v. Rainbow Resources, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1987
  5. Deace v. StriblingCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1942

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API