Legal Opinion

Jackson v. Pennsylvania Financial Responsibility Assigned Claims Plan

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 29, 1990No. 1618PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

In this action for uninsured motorist benefits, the trial court determined that the vehicle allegedly responsible for the claimant’s injuries was not uninsured and entered summary judgment in favor of the assigned carrier. The claimant has appealed.

James Jackson was injured while riding as a passenger in a vehicle being driven by James McQuillar when it was struck in the rear by a vehicle driven by a third person who identified himself as “Rodney Gardner, Jr.” Jackson filed an action against the Pennsylvania Assigned Claims Plan and Travelers Insurance Company, the designated carrier,…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mowery v. Prudential Property & Casualty Ins.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  2. Cooke v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

4Cited by13 opinions

  1. Hodges v. RodriguezSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  2. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. FosterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  3. Kiker v. Pennsylvania Financial Responsibility Assigned Claims PlanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  4. Vanderhoff v. Harleysville Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  5. Hatcher v. Travelers InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API