Legal Opinion

City of Cherokee v. Tatro

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 3, 1981No. 54865PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*338LAVENDER, Justice:

Appellee (Tatro) is the owner of two adjoining tracts of land within the city of Cherokee, Oklahoma, which tracts are located on Highway 64 in a residential area. Prior to the enactment of restrictive zoning ordinances by the City of Cherokee (City) Tatro erected and maintained an automobile service station on one of the lots. Ta-tro’s adjoining lot is a vacant lot. Having received an attractive offer for the two lots provided Tatro was able to secure a valid building permit for the construction of a convenience store on both of the lots, Tatro applied to City’s building…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Sugar v. North Baltimore Methodist Protestant ChurchCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1933
  2. Michigan-Lake Building Corp. v. HamiltonIllinois Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Auditorium, Inc. v. Board of Adjustment of Mayor & Council of WilmingtonSuperior Court of Delaware · 1952
  4. La Salle National Bank v. County of LakeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975
  5. O'ROURKE v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1969

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Schwartz v. City of FlintMichigan Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Kinzy v. State ex rel. Oklahoma Firefighters Pension & Retirement SystemSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
  3. Dewey v. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Firefighters Pension & Retirement SystemSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
  4. State Ex Rel. Casey's General Stores, Inc. v. City Council of SalemMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. Nay v. First Financial Bank, FSBCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2003

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API