Legal Opinion
Eddleman v. United States Department of Labor
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided January 15, 1991No. 88-2793PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McKAY, Circuit Judge.
This appeal arises from an attempt by the appellant, United States Department of Labor (“DOL”), to maintain an administrative action against a chapter 11 debtor. The United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Colorado ruled that DOL’s action was stayed by the automatic stay provision of the Bankruptcy Code, and the district court affirmed. We reverse.
I. Facts
Appellees James and Jane Eddleman owned a mail-hauling business. They did most of their work under a contract with the United States Postal Service. On August 6, 1986, the Eddlemans filed a petition for relief…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Abney v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United Sav. Assn. of Tex. v. Timbers of Inwood Forest Associates, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Norwest Bank Worthington v. AhlersSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Intercontinental Enterprises, Inc. v. Keller (In Re Blinder, Robinson & Co.)District Court, D. Colorado · 1991
- Ngan Gung Restaurant, Inc. v. New York (In Re Ngan Gung Restaurant, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1995
- Cascade Energy & Metals Corp. v. Banks (In re Cascade Energy & Metals Corp.)Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
- EFL Ltd. v. Miramar Resources, Inc. (In Re Tascosa Petroleum Corp.)District Court, D. Kansas · 1996
- Maritan v. ToddDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1996
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.