Legal Opinion
Salazar-Regino v. Trominski
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided June 30, 2005No. 03-41492PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JERRY E. SMITH, Circuit Judge:
The petitioners are lawful permanent resident aliens who pleaded guilty to marihuana possession offenses and received deferred adjudication in state court. Based on their guilty pleas, the government successfully sought their removal from the United States. Although at the time of their guilty pleas the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) interpreted the relevant immigration statutes as not requiring removal for this type of deferred adjudication (or at least as allowing for discretion*441ary relief from removal), the petitioners were found to be removable and…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. St. CyrSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Linkletter v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Logan v. Zimmerman Brush Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- United States v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006
- Ramirez-Molina v. ZiglarCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006
- Malagon De Fuentes v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006
- Omolo v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006
- June Medical Services LLC v. KliebertDistrict Court, M.D. Louisiana · 2017
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.