Legal Opinion

Levien v. Board of Zoning & Appeals

New York Supreme Court

Decided September 4, 1970PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Berítard S. Meyer, J.

The papers on this motion to dismiss an article 78 proceeding are somewhat confused because respondents ’ counsel has misconceived the applicability to such a proceeding of CPLR 3211 (subd. [c]) and put into his supporting affidavits much of the pleading and evidence that should have gone into an answer and return. An article 78 proceeding is a special proceeding (CPLR 7804, subd. [a]), intended to be summarily decided ‘ ‘ upon the pleadings, papers and admissions to the .extent that no triable issues of fact are raised ” (CPLR 409, subd. [b]), and to be tried forthwith…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Village of Island Park v. Bulk Plants, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Cave v. Zoning Board of AppealsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
  2. Battaglia v. SchulerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
  3. Valvo v. Urban Development Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1972
  4. McCrory v. Village of MamaroneckNew York Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Zumpano v. City of UticaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API