Legal Opinion

Eric Daniel Farias v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided November 1, 2012No. 01-12-00205-CRPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LAURA CARTER HIGLEY, Justice.

Appellant, Eric Daniel Farias, was charged by indictment with possession of a controlled substance greater than 400 grams with intent to deliver. 1 Following a hearing, the trial court denied appellant’s two motions to suppress and a motion to disclose the identity of the confidential informant. After the State agreed to reduce the charge in the indictment to possession of a controlled substance greater than 400 grams, 2 appellant pleaded guilty with an agreed recommendation of 10 years’ confinement without an assessment of a fine. The trial court assessed…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mizell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2003
  2. Rhodes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
  3. Shannon v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
  4. Hern v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994
  5. Tijerina v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2011

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Lombardo v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2017
  2. Sammy Vidales v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2015
  3. Caleb Logan Hart v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2015
  4. Akintayo Taiwo Akinrinlola v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2026
  5. Akintayo Taiwo Akinrinlola v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2026

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API