Legal Opinion

Noble v. Teeple

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 10, 1897No. 9355PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error from Neosho District Court. Hon. L. Still-well, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtDoster, C. J.

This case involves the construction of a will. Isaac Teeple resided in Pennsyvania, and died there in 1880. He left a will, the provisions of which, so far as related to the question in controversy, are as follows :

'"“As to my property, both real and personal, I be*399queath to my son, Thomas W. Teeple, the sum of one dollar, and to Amanda Anne, the wife of my said son, Thomas W. Teeple, and her children by her present husband begotten, I bequeath what is known as the Fisher farm, a tract of land situate, lying and being in the State of Kansas, in the county of Neosho, being the southwest quarter…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Baker v. StewartSupreme Court of Kansas · 1888
  2. Robinson v. DuvallCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1880
  3. Farr v. Trustees of the Grand Lodge of the Ancient Order of United WorkmenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Simons v. McLainSupreme Court of Kansas · 1893

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Capitol Federal Savings & Loan Assoc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1974
  2. Dannefer v. AurandSupreme Court of Kansas · 1920
  3. Eaton v. MorseMontana Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Coleman v. ColemanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1904
  5. Rostocil v. United Oil & Gas Royalty Ass'nSupreme Court of Kansas · 1954

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API