Ledford v. Hill

(After stating the foregoing facts.) Special ground 1 of the motion for new trial complains that the court erred in admitting in evidence certain testimony of one of the witnesses for the defendant, as follows: “The paper you hand me conveyed to me an acre of land. I bought the acre from W. A. Smith in 1933. When I bought it, there was a consideration of a well on that property. It was on the acre of land that I bought . I think it was 18 feet from the east line. I have seen the well and land that Mr. Hill has bought. The well and the line east of the well are just like they were when I owned…