Legal Opinion

Workman v. Stephenson

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided September 15, 1914No. 4005PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to the Rio Grande District Court. Hon Chas. C. Holbrook, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtKing, J.

For convenience, the parties hereto' will be called plaintiff and defendant, as in the trial court. Jesse Stephenson, defendant in error, was plaintiff, and Melinda J. Workman defendant. Mrs. Workman was the widow of Travis D. Workman, and she and her two minor children, as heirs of *340said Travis D. Workman, were the owners of the north half of the northwest quarter of section 7, township 38 north, range 9 E. N. M. M., together with other lands lying east of the tract described. Plaintiff was the owner of a tract of land, the northwest comer of which was coincident with the southeast corner of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. White v. Manhattan Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1893
  2. Johnson v. SkillmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1882
  3. Tynon v. DespainSupreme Court of Colorado · 1896
  4. Long v. MayberryTennessee Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Arthur Irrigation Co. v. StrayerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1911

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Isenberg v. WoitchekSupreme Court of Colorado · 1960
  2. Stuart v. Colorado Eastern RailroadSupreme Court of Colorado · 1916
  3. Rogers v. Lower Clear Creek Ditch Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API