Legal Opinion
Kidney Association of Oregon v. Ferguson
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided February 14, 1990No. 135-858; CA A45750PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*525EDMONDS, J.
Intervenor and the amici petition for review of our previous decision, 97 Or App 120, 775 P2d 1383 (1989), which we treat as a petition for reconsideration. ORAP 9.15. We allow reconsideration and adhere to our previous holding.
In our opinion, we said:
“McMenamin informed Marx, president and chairman of the board of KAO, of the personal representative’s request (for consent to the potentially conflicting representation), and Marx approved of the dual representation. The record does not show that Marx had authority to act on behalf of the board, however.” Kidney Association of Oregon…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 1985
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of SamuelsOregon Supreme Court · 1983
- Kidney Ass'n of Oregon, Inc. v. FergusonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
3Cited by4 opinions
- Kidney Association of Oregon v. FergusonOregon Supreme Court · 1992
- Matter of Estate of BrandonAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
- Brandon v. Hedland, Fleischer, Friedman & CookeAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
- Kidney Association of Oregon v. FergusonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990