Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Mills v. Monlux

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided July 16, 2025No. 2:25-cv-00742Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 8 AT SEATTLE 9 10 ALAN MILLS, CASE NO. C25-0742JLR 11 Plaintiff, ORDER v. 12 LAUREL D. CRONK MONLUX, 13 Defendant. 14 15 I. INTRODUCTION 16 Before the court are two motions filed by pro se Plaintiff Alan Mills: (1) a motion 17 to strike purported “improper responses” in Defendant Laurel D. Cronk Monlux’s answer 18 (MTSIR (Dkt. # 11); MTSIR Reply (Dkt. # 22)) and (2) a motion to strike Ms. Monlux’s 19 affirmative defenses (MTSAD (Dkt. # 12); MTSAD Reply (Dkt. # 23)). Ms. Monlux 20 opposes both motions. (MTSIR Resp. (Dkt.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Mladen Zivkovic v. Southern California Edison CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  2. Whittlestone, Inc. v. Handi-Craft Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  3. Barnes v. AT & T Pension Benefit Plannonbargained ProgramDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2010
  4. Chris Kohler v. Flava EnterprisesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  5. Rosen v. Masterpiece Marketing Group, LLCDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2016

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API