Oregon Short Line R. R. Co. v. Pfost
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWbenette, J.
This is an application for a writ of mandate, to require the Commissioner of Law Enforcement of the 'State of Idaho to approve the applicant’s claim for refund of the excise gasoline tax paid by it, under protest, to the state pursuant to the provisions of section 18, chapter 46, Laws of 1933.
The applicant, Oregon Short Line Railroad Corporation, is operating as a common carrier, with its main line extending across the southern part of the state in an easterly and westerly direction. It also owns and operates a number of branch lines in the south part of the state. Prior to the year 1933 it…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Sun Printing & Publishing Ass'n v. Mayor of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
- People v. Texas Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1929
- Grice v. Clearwater Timber Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1911
- Independent School District, Class A, No. 1 v. PfostIdaho Supreme Court · 1931
- Heman Construction Co. v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1907
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Higer v. HansenIdaho Supreme Court · 1946
- Wright v. CallahanIdaho Supreme Court · 1940
- City of Lewiston v. MathewsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1956
- Phipps v. Boise Street Car Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1940
- C. Forsman Real Estate Company v. HatchIdaho Supreme Court · 1976
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.