Legal Opinion

Hill v. Industrial Commission

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided December 17, 1931No. 20953. Judgment reversed and award set asidePublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. ChiEE Justice Stone

delivered the opinion of the court:

The defendant in error, Jerry Hill, was injured while in the employ of Lee Weber, a farmer, and filed an application for adjustment of his claim with the Industrial Commission. There are no questions of fact involved in the case. The arbitrator entered an award, which the commission, on review, set aside. On certiorari from the circuit court of Peoria county the finding of the commission was set aside and an award entered. The cause is here on writ of error allowed by this court.

Plaintiff in error is a farmer operating a farm of about…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cook v. MasseyIdaho Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Vaughan's Seed Store v. SimoniniIllinois Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Roush v. HeffelbowerMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Peterson v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1924

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Baldwin, State Treasurer v. RobyWyoming Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Kehrer v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Thomas Smith Farms, Inc. v. AldaySupreme Court of Florida · 1966
  4. Hagemann v. Illinois Workers' Compensation CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 2010
  5. Noverio v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1932

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API