Legal Opinion
Grant v. Kellogg Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 18, 1943PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LEIBELL, District Judge.
This is a motion by the defendant, Kellogg Company, for an order permitting it to appear specially in this action solely for the purpose of protecting its interest in certain bank deposits located in this State, previously attached herein under a New York Supreme Court warrant of attachment, and limiting plaintiff’s recovery, if any, in this action to the property attached.
The action was commenced in the Supreme Court of the State of New York by the plaintiff, Vernon Grant, for the recovery of money damages from the defendant, Kellogg Company. Without going into too…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Cooper v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
- Employers Reinsurance Corp. v. BryantSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- St. Louis & San Francisco Railway Co. v. McBrideSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Merchants Heat & Light Co. v. J. B. Clow & SonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. BalanovskiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
- United States v. BalanovskiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
- Dry Clime Lamp Corp. v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
- U. S. Industries, Inc. v. GreggDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1973
- United States v. BalanovskiDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1955
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.