Legal Opinion

Ryan Kerwin & Xtreme Caged Combat v. Rosenblum

United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided May 3, 2022No. 19-00241Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN RE: : : Chapter 13 STEVEN ROSENBLUM, : : Bankruptcy No. 14-19756-AMC DEBTOR : RYAN KERWIN D/B/A XTREME : CAGED COMBAT, : PLAINTIFF : : Adv. No. 19-00241-AMC V. : STEVEN ROSENBLUM, : DEFENDANT : MEMORANDUM OPINION Ashely M. Chan, United States Bankruptcy Judge I. INTRODUCTION On December 11, 2014, Steven Rosenblum (“Debtor”) filed a voluntary petition for relief under Chapter 13 of the Bankruptcy Code (‘Petition Date”). Thereafter, pro se creditor, Ryan Kerwin (“Kerwin”), filed countless motions and an adversary complaint…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Liteky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  3. United States v. Michael Lee SammonsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
  4. George C. Hook v. The Honorable Joe Billy McDade Judge, United States District Court for the Central District of IllinoisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
  5. In the Matter of Robert Jackson Horton, Bankrupt. Stewart Enterprises, Inc. v. Robert Jackson Horton, M. Nolten, TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API