Legal Opinion
Bor. of Collingswood v. Ringgold
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided January 24, 1975PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
66 N.J. 350 (1975)
331 A.2d 262
BOROUGH OF COLLINGSWOOD, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
DONALD RINGGOLD AND JOHN C. ASHHURST, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Argued November 20, 1973.
Decided January 24, 1975.
Mr. Emanuel Greenberg, of the New York bar, argued the cause for defendants-appellants (Mr. Bryan B. McKernan, attorney).
Mr. James A. Perrin, Municipal Prosecutor, argued the cause for plaintiff-respondent.
The opinion of the court was delivered by CLIFFORD, J.
The issue raised by this appeal is the constitutionality of the Borough of Collingswood's Ordinance No. 601,…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited74 opinions
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Cantwell v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. ButtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Somers Associates v. Gloucester Tp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1990
- Matter of Rules Adoption Regarding Inmate-Therapist Conf.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1988
- Robbiani v. BurkeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1978