Legal Opinion
Matter of Rules Adoption Regarding Inmate-Therapist Conf.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided April 4, 1988PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
224 N.J. Super. 252 (1988)
540 A.2d 212
IN THE MATTER OF RULES ADOPTION REGARDING INMATE-THERAPIST CONFIDENTIALITY [N.J.A.C. 10A:16-4.4].
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued January 11, 1988.
Decided April 4, 1988.
Before Judges O'BRIEN, HAVEY and STERN.
Catherine A. Hanssens, Assistant Deputy Public Defender, argued the cause for appellant (Alfred A. Slocum, Public Advocate/Defender of New Jersey, attorney; Catherine A. Hanssens, of counsel and on the brief).
Stephen P. Tasy and Vicki A. Mangiaracina, Deputy Attorneys General, argued the cause for respondents (W. Cary Edwards,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Turner v. SafleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- O'Lone v. Estate of ShabazzSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- City of Revere v. Massachusetts General HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Jones v. North Carolina Prisoners' Labor Union, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Kinsella v. KinsellaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1997
- Pryor v. Department of CorrectionsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2007
- State v. J.E.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1992
- Leah Coleman v. Sonia Martinez (084489) (Camden County & Statewide)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2021
- State v. JENew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1992