State v. Ramos
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtSchindler, J.
¶1 Antonio Ramos appeals his conviction of unlawful delivery of cocaine. Ramos contends prosecutorial misconduct during cross-examination and closing argument violated his constitutional right to a fair trial. Because there is a substantial likelihood that prosecutorial misconduct affected the jury’s verdict, we reverse and remand for a new trial.
FACTS
¶2 Lance Tatum works as a paid informant for the Northwest Regional Drug Task Force in Whatcom County (Task Force). Tatum receives $100 for each drug transaction he arranges for the Task Force.
¶3 Tatum testified that he obtained the telephone…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- State v. StensonWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. StensonWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. RussellWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- Miller v. PateSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- State v. GregoryWashington Supreme Court · 2006
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- State v. RamosCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
- In Re The Detention Of: Charles UrlacherCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018
- State Of Washington v. Zachary Damien CravenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
- Personal Restraint Petition Of Hach PhethCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2022
- Ronald Brennan v. State Of WashingtonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.