Legal Opinion

State v. Ramos

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided October 17, 2011No. 65213-3-IPublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchindler, J.

¶1 Antonio Ramos appeals his conviction of unlawful delivery of cocaine. Ramos contends prosecutorial misconduct during cross-examination and closing argument violated his constitutional right to a fair trial. Because there is a substantial likelihood that prosecutorial misconduct affected the jury’s verdict, we reverse and remand for a new trial.

FACTS

¶2 Lance Tatum works as a paid informant for the Northwest Regional Drug Task Force in Whatcom County (Task Force). Tatum receives $100 for each drug transaction he arranges for the Task Force.

¶3 Tatum testified that he obtained the telephone…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. State v. StensonWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State v. StensonWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  3. State v. RussellWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Miller v. PateSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. State v. GregoryWashington Supreme Court · 2006

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. State v. RamosCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
  2. In Re The Detention Of: Charles UrlacherCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018
  3. State Of Washington v. Zachary Damien CravenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
  4. Personal Restraint Petition Of Hach PhethCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2022
  5. Ronald Brennan v. State Of WashingtonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API