Legal Opinion

Sheffield v. International Harvesting Machine Co. of America

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 15, 1908No. 568PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Complaint, from city court of Miller county — Judge Bush. May 18, 1907.

1Opinion of the CourtHill, C. J.

The international Harvesting Machine Company of America sued Sheffield as principal, and Kelley as indorser, on a promissory note which contained the following provision: “In consideration of the renewal and extension of my notes, Nos. 83973 and 83973, year 1903-04, I hereby acknowledge full satisfaction of and unconditionally release and relinquish any and all claims arising out of purchase of the machine for which the note or notes of which this is a renewal was given.” The defendants; filed a joint plea of the general issue, and further pleaded a total failure of consideration as to the.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Fairbanks, Morse & Co. v. BaskettMissouri Court of Appeals · 1903

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hatten R. Co. v. Baylies Et Ux.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1930
  2. McDaniel v. Mallary Bros. Machinery Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
  3. Franklin Phosphate Co. v. International Harvester Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Florida · 1911
  4. Boardman v. FrickWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Schofield-Burkett Construction Co. v. RichCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1915

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API