Legal Opinion

Schofield-Burkett Construction Co. v. Rich

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 10, 1915No. 5801PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Complaint; from city court of Bainbridge — Judge Spooner. May 8, 1914.

1Opinion of the CourtBroyles, J.

1. There was no error in allowing the amendments to the defendant’s pleas, or in overruling the demurrers to the pleas as finally amended; the written contract signed contemporaneously with the notes, and afterwards introduced in evidence, not being set out or referred to in the pleadings.

2. A purchaser of an article who has given his promissory notes for the price and signed contemporaneously an unambiguous written contract in regard to the same transaction, and therein accepted a limited warranty and stipulated not to exact anything beyond, can not prove by parol other representations or…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Forsyth Manufacturing Co. v. CastlenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  2. Pryor v. Ludden & Bates Southern Music HouseSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
  3. Heitmann v. Commercial BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
  4. John A. Roebling's Sons Co. v. Southern Power Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1914
  5. Brannen v. BrannenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1911

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Massey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1937
  2. Case-Fowler Lumber Co. v. Good Roads Machinery Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API