Legal Opinion

Boyd v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 23, 2009No. A09A1183PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ANDREWS, Presiding Judge.

Marcus Allen Boyd was found guilty at a bench trial of possession of methamphetamine with intent to distribute. Boyd, who was a passenger in a vehicle stopped by police for a traffic violation, claims police violated his Fourth Amendment right to be free from unreasonable search or seizure when they patted him down for weapons during the stop, summoned a drug-sniffing dog which alerted on his shoes, then searched his shoes and found hidden methamphetamine. Because there was no Fourth Amendment violation, we find the trial court correctly denied Boyd’s motion to…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. United States v. SharpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Brendlin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 2007

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. JenkinsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
  2. Nunnally v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
  3. Sims v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
  4. Wilson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
  5. Andrew Wilson v. Teh StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API