Wilson v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
PHIPPS, Presiding Judge.
After a bench trial on stipulated facts, Andrew Wilson was convicted of possession of less than one ounce of marijuana. He appeals his conviction, contending that the court erred by denying his *60motion to suppress because police officers unlawfully stopped and searched his vehicle, and unlawfully prolonged his detention. For the reasons that follow, we affirm.
When an appellate court reviews a trial court’s order concerning a motion to suppress evidence, the appellate court should be guided by three principles with regard to the interpretation of the trial court’s…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Vansant v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994
- Tate v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994
- Miller v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2010
- State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
- McDaniel v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. PriceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
- Mordica v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
- Alejandro Cruz Ayala v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2025
- State v. Mykell PriceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013