Legal Opinion
Mitchell v. BD. OF TR. OF PICKENS CTY. SD" A"
District Court, D. South Carolina
Decided April 6, 1976No. Civ. A. 75-143PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
CHAPMAN, District Judge.
Plaintiff brought this action because defendants, when informed of plaintiff’s pregnancy, failed to rehire or to renew plaintiff’s teaching contract for the entirety of the 1972-73 school year, allegedly in violation of her rights secured by the Constitution of the United States and the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended.
The amended complaint in this case contains two causes of action which were the basis of two prior actions. Civil Action 72-1123 was an action by plaintiff alleging constitutional infringements cognizable under 42 U.S.C. § 1981 and § 1983.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Griggs v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Reed v. ReedSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Frontiero v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LaFleurSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Geduldig v. AielloSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Barbara S. Clanton v. Orleans Parish School BoardCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Penk v. Oregon State Board of Higher EducationDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1981
- Tavernaris v. Beaver Area School DistrictDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1978
- Ludwig v. Quebecor Dailies, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1980
- Members of the Bridgeport Housing Authority Police Force v. City of BridgeportDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1980