Legal Opinion
Barnett v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District
Decided December 30, 1991No. 13-91-459-CRPublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NYE, Chief Justice.
Appellant was convicted by a jury of sexual assault. (Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 22.011 (Vernon 1989). Due to an enhancement provision, the trial court assessed punishment at twenty-five years in prison, plus restitution for court costs and for his court appointed attorney’s fees. By one point of error, appellant complains of insufficient evidence to support his conviction, claiming that the record does not show that the act was done without the victim’s consent. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
In reviewing sufficiency of the evidence claims, we view the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Houston v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
- Wisdom v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
- Bannach v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1986
- Garcia v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1988
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Edwards v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2003
- Curtis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2002
- Horne v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2001
- State v. VantreeceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
- Albert F. Haarmann v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2008
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.