Legal Opinion
United States v. Dean
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided February 20, 2008No. 06-14918PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MOORE, District Judge:
There are two main issues involved in this appeal. First, this Court reviews whether there was sufficient evidence to convict codefendants Christopher Michael Dean and Ricardo Curtis Lopez (“Appellants”) for conspiracy to interfere with interstate commerce by robbery in violation of the Hobbs Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1951(a). Second, this Court also examines whether 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(l)(A)(iii), a sentencing enhancement for discharge of a firearm, includes an intent element. Lopez also raises separate issues involving a claimed erroneous jury instruction and the consolidation…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Harris v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- United States v. Billy Jack KeeneCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2006
- Norman Darnell Baxter v. Albert G. Thomas, Warden, Georgia Diagnostic and Classification CenterCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1995
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Dean v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- United States v. McNairCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010
- United States v. Travis Lamont SmithCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2014
- United States v. Michael GrzybowiczCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2014
- United States v. Trevor RansferCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2014
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.