Legal Opinion · Dissent

Shimola v. Nationwide Insurance

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 23, 1986No. 85-1064Published

1DissentCelebrezze, C.J.

In vacating the award of punitive damages, the majority dismisses appellant’s proof of actual damages as “mere conjecture.” It is regrettable that more careful consideration was not given to each item of damage enumerated by appellant in his testimony. I believe that the record does demonstrate sufficient proof of actual bad faith damages to support the jury’s punitive damages award.

Appellant Shimola first stated that as a result of Nationwide’s failure to pay his claim he incurred interest charges on a debt he was unable to pay and suffered the loss of some $400,000 in future profits from…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bishop v. East Ohio Gas Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Employers' Fire Insurance v. United Parcel Service of Cincinnati, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1950
  3. Kohnle v. CareyOhio Court of Appeals · 1946
  4. Layton v. Ferguson Moving & Storage Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1959
  5. Rospert v. Old Fort Mills, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1947

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API