Legal Opinion

Kula v. Jersey Mutual Casualty Insurance

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided July 1, 1930PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Porter, S. C. C.

This case was tried by the court, by consent of the parties, without a jury on an agreed state of facts.

It appears that there was an automobile collision on August 27th, 1927, between an automobile operated by Stanley Kula, a son of the plaintiff, in which his mother, Mary A. Kula, was a passenger, and a taxicab owned by Erank Eernicola. *930Mary Kula received bodily injury. A suit was brought in this court by the plaintiff and his wife, Mary A. Kula, against said Eernicola for damages to the wife for bodily injuries and to the husband, the plaintiff here, for loss of consortium…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Danek v. HommerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953
  2. Jones v. WilliamsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API