Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Geib

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided June 1, 1965PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

William J. Regan, S.

A decree of this court admitted the will of the above decedent to probate but reserved to a later date the court’s decision concerning a question of construction raised by the special guardian. Paragraph Third of the will reads as follows: “In the event, however, that my husband should predecease me, I give, devise and bequeath all the rest, residue and remainder of my property, both real and personal, to my children and direct that the same be divided equally among all of my children. It is my intention that if there should be any children born after the date of this will…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Jenkins v. FreyerNew York Court of Chancery · 1833
  2. In Re the Accounting of MullerNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
  3. In Re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of TruslowNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
  4. In re the Will of JergeNew York Surrogate's Court · 1943
  5. In re TienkenNew York Supreme Court · 1892

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of LeuerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1976
  2. In re the Estate of BarnumNew York Surrogate's Court · 1967
  3. In re the Estate of NiegschNew York Surrogate's Court · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API