Legal Opinion

People v. Edgmon

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 29, 1968No. Crim. 4691PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPierce, P. J.

The appeal is from judgment following a first degree murder conviction by a jury. Two contentions are raised: (1) insufficiency of the evidence to support the conviction; (2) inadequacy of defendant’s trial counsel. We disallow both contentions.

At the outset we reiterate often stated rules:

Before a conviction will be reversed on the ground of insufficiency of the evidence it must clearly appear that upon no hypothesis whatever is there sufficient substantial evidence to support the judgment. (People v. Newland (1940) 15 Cal.2d 678, 681 [104 P.2d 778]; People v. Alonzo (1958) 158 Cal.App.2d…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. People v. NewlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  2. People v. IbarraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  3. People v. HilleryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  4. People v. HendersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  5. People v. GorshenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. People v. NewtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  2. People v. PenaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  3. People v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  4. People v. BrooksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  5. People v. VeitchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API