Legal Opinion

Continental Casualty Co. v. Kemper Insurance

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 2, 2007No. 2771, Sept. Term, 2005PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSharer, J.

The interpretation of an exclusion in a business automobile liability policy forms the basis of this appeal and the underlying litigation. Appellee, Kemper Insurance Company, sought a declaration, in the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County, of its rights, vis-a-vis appellant, Continental Casualty Company.

Following a bench trial, the circuit court entered a declaratory judgment in favor of Kemper, ruling that Continental wrongfully denied coverage under the policy in question, and awarded damages to Kemper, plus attorney’s fees.

Disenchanted with that result, Continental has noted this…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Magnon v. CollinsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1999
  2. Atlantic Contracting & Material Co. v. Ulico Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
  3. Texas Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. v. SturrockTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Cooper v. Berkshire Life InsuranceCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  5. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. SourasCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1989

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Brass Metal Products, Inc. v. E-J Enterprises Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2009
  2. Tig Insurance v. Monongahela Power Co.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2012
  3. United States Life Insurance v. WilsonCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2011
  4. Francis v. Allstate InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2012
  5. Bayside Fire Protection, LLC v. Everest Indemnity Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2022

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API