Legal Opinion
Minnesota Water Resources Board v. County of Traverse
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided May 8, 1970No. 41786PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Otis, Justice.
This is an appeal by the Minnesota Water Resources Board from a decision of the District Court of Lac qui Parle County modifying the boundaries of the Upper Minnesota River Watershed District established by the board. Because we hold that the board does not have authority under the law of Minnesota to take this appeal and there are no other appellants we do not reach the merits of the controversy.
These proceedings were initiated by the commissioners of Big Stone County to establish a watershed district pursuant to Minn. St. c. 112. Hearings were conducted by the board on April…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Muench v. Public Service CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1952
- Department of Labor & Industries v. CookWashington Supreme Court · 1954
- Moede v. County of StearnsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
- Kirchoff v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
- Fairmont Real Estate & Investment Co. v. County of MartinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Murphy Bernabe v. Tribunal Superior de Puerto RicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1975
- Kentucky State Racing Commission v. FullerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1972
- Utah Department of Business Regulation, Division of Public Utilities v. Public Service CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1980
- State Board of Registration for Architects, Engineers, & Land Surveyors v. GetsugSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
- Minnesota State Board of Health v. Governor's Certificate of Need Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.