Legal Opinion

Angelo Frank Lugo v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 20, 1965No. 19780_1PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BASTIAN, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal by one of two code-fendants, both of whom were convicted of knowingly importing a narcotic drug [heroin] into the United States, contrary to 21 U.S.C. § 173, and knowingly receiving, concealing and facilitating the transportation and concealment of the same drug contrary to 21 U.S.C. § 174.

Appellant urges two points on appeal: that he was denied his Sixth Amendment right to the effective assistance of counsel by virtue of the fact that one attorney represented both appellant and his code-fendant, and that it was error for the court to allow…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Lucina Chavira Gonzales v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. Irving v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Karen Sue Morris v. State of California Ventura County Municipal Court Attorney General of the State of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  3. State v. KruchtenArizona Supreme Court · 1966
  4. George T. C. Lollar v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
  5. The People v. SomervilleIllinois Supreme Court · 1969

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API