Angelo Frank Lugo v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BASTIAN, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal by one of two code-fendants, both of whom were convicted of knowingly importing a narcotic drug [heroin] into the United States, contrary to 21 U.S.C. § 173, and knowingly receiving, concealing and facilitating the transportation and concealment of the same drug contrary to 21 U.S.C. § 174.
Appellant urges two points on appeal: that he was denied his Sixth Amendment right to the effective assistance of counsel by virtue of the fact that one attorney represented both appellant and his code-fendant, and that it was error for the court to allow…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Lucina Chavira Gonzales v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
3Cited by54 opinions
- Irving v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1978
- Karen Sue Morris v. State of California Ventura County Municipal Court Attorney General of the State of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- State v. KruchtenArizona Supreme Court · 1966
- George T. C. Lollar v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
- The People v. SomervilleIllinois Supreme Court · 1969
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.