Legal Opinion
R. P. Farnsworth & Co. v. Albert
District Court, E.D. Louisiana
Decided August 9, 1948No. Civ. A. No. 492PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CHRISTENBERRY, District Judge.
This case was tried to the Court without a jury.
It is a suit for a money judgment in the sum of $6,549.60, representing damages allegedly suffered by the plaintiff by reason of an alleged breach of contract.
*28Findings of Fact
The plaintiff, R. P. Farnsworth & Co. Inc., is a corporation organized under the laws of the state of Delaware, doing business in the State of Louisiana and elsewhere as a general building contractor. The defendant, Harry J. Albert, is a resident of the city of Baton Rouge, Louisiana, and is a plastering contractor.
On or about July 24, 1947,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Reimann Const. Co. v. HeinzLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1931
- Schorr v. NosackaLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1931
- Harris v. LillisLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1946
3Cited by3 opinions
- EA Coronis Assocs. v. M. Gordon Constr. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1966
- Salvador Calzadillas v. The Wonderful CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019
- Saxton v. County of SonomaDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2023