Legal Opinion

Andrew S. Satterfield v. State of Indiana

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 26, 2015No. 63S00-1401-LW-306PublishedCited by 69 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RUSH, Chief Justice.

Andrew Satterfield brings this direct appeal to challenge his convictions and sentence of life imprisonment without the possibility of parole (“LWOP”) for murder and arson. Based on the LWOP sentence, we have mandatory and exclusive jurisdiction over this appeal. Ind. Appellate Rule 4(A)(1)(a). Satterfield presents three issues: that (1) the jury’s decision not to find him insane or guilty but mentally ill is contrary to law; (2) the trial court abused its discretion by admitting testimony about his evasiveness during police questioning; and (3) his LWOP sentence is…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Cardwell v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Andrew Conley v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Randy L. Knapp v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Kubsch v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Shawn Blount v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2014

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by69 opinions

  1. Larry C. Perry, Jr. v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2017
  2. Carltez Taylor v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2017
  3. Marcus Zanders v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2017
  4. Lori Barcroft v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2018
  5. A House Mechanics, Inc. v. Michael MasseyIndiana Court of Appeals · 2019

64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API