United States v. Solomon
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
LUCERO, Circuit Judge.
Defendant Pieter Solomon appeals from his criminal conviction and sentence. The sole issue on appeal is whether United States Sentencing Guideline § 2K2.1(a)(4)(B) is unconstitutionally vague as applied to the facts of this case. Our jurisdiction arises under 18 U.S.C. § 3742(d) and 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm.
In August 1994 defendant sold a small quantity of marijuana to co-defendant Roy Winkleman. Over the next several months, Solomon bought methamphetamine from Winkleman on a weekly basis. At the instruction of Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms agent Billy…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- United States Civil Service Commission v. National Ass'n of Letter CarriersSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. MazurieSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. MichelCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. BennettCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. John NevarezCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001