Legal Opinion

United States v. Solomon

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided September 3, 1996No. 95-5181PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LUCERO, Circuit Judge.

Defendant Pieter Solomon appeals from his criminal conviction and sentence. The sole issue on appeal is whether United States Sentencing Guideline § 2K2.1(a)(4)(B) is unconstitutionally vague as applied to the facts of this case. Our jurisdiction arises under 18 U.S.C. § 3742(d) and 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm.

In August 1994 defendant sold a small quantity of marijuana to co-defendant Roy Winkleman. Over the next several months, Solomon bought methamphetamine from Winkleman on a weekly basis. At the instruction of Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms agent Billy…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. United States Civil Service Commission v. National Ass'n of Letter CarriersSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. United States v. MazurieSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. United States v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. MichelCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
  2. United States v. BennettCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
  3. United States v. John NevarezCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API