Taquena v. BOB VALE PAINTING COMPANY
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
BARNES, Justice:
This original proceeding involves separate claims for compensable injuries received by three painters when a scaffold collapsed. No controversy exists between claimants and their employer (Bob Vale Painting Company) as to the trial judge’s orders awarding compensation, affirmed by the State Industrial Court en banc, except for two matters to be mentioned later. By appropriate order these cases were consolidated under the surviving number for review by this Court. The issue presented is whether insurer of claimant’s employer is solely responsible, or whether liability should be…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- O. K. Boiler & Welding Co. v. Minnetonka Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Scruggs Bros. & Bill Garage v. State Industrial Com.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Commercial Lumber Co. v. NelsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- E. D. Bedwell Coal Co. v. State Industrial Com.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
- Bergstrom Painting Co. v. PruettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Madrid v. NortonWyoming Supreme Court · 1979
- Martin v. Chapel, Wilkinson, Riggs, and AbneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
- Betenson v. Call Auto & Equipment Sales, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1982
- Madrid v. NortonWyoming Supreme Court · 1979