Legal Opinion · Concurrence

State v. Shing

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided May 7, 1973No. 2291Published

1Concurrence

JACOBSON, Chief Judge Division 1, Court of Appeals

(specially concurring) :

I concur that the defendant’s conviction and sentence in this case must be affirmed. Since I concur in the result of this Court, this concurring opinion shall only deal with the area upon which I disagree with the majority in.reaching that result.

The majority has concluded that the prosecutor’s comment in closing argument to the jury upon the defendant’s silence after arrest was “fundamental error which was not waived by the failure of the defendant to object . . . .” It is with this statement that I disagree.

In order…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Harris v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Grunewald v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  5. Raffel v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API