Legal Opinion · Dissent

United States v. Davis

Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals

Decided February 21, 1997No. NMCM 96 00319Published

1Dissent

Judge LUCAS

(dissenting):

I respectfully dissent. In the pretrial agreement for this contested general court-martial, the appellant agreed to waive his right to be tried by members, to present evidence on the merits, and to call witnesses on the merits. The appellant also agreed to enter into a confessional stipulation of fact, Prosecution Exhibit 1, which effectively encompassed all of the elements of the charged offenses. Now, the appellant contends that the combination of those pretrial agreement terms violates Rule for Courts-Martial 705(c)(1)(B), Manual for Courts-Martial, United States…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. CareUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1969
  2. United States v. BertelsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1977
  3. United States v. CassityU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1992
  4. United States v. KeyesU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API