Legal Opinion

Village of Beverly Hills v. Schulter

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided July 7, 1939PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an action to recover for license taxes on the sale of gasoline in the village of Beverly Hills, St. Louis County. The cause was submitted to the court on agreed statement of facts, and the finding and judgment for $510.76, including interest, were for plaintiff. Defendant appealed, and the appeal came to this court on the theory that the construction of the Federal and State Constitutions is involved.

Section 1 of Ordinance No. 13 provides: "No person, firm, or corporation shall engage in, carry on, or conduct the business of selling gasoline or motor fuel and/or transporting the same…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Bowman v. Continental Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
  2. Steckert v. City of East SaginawMichigan Supreme Court · 1870
  3. Aurora Water Co. v. City of AuroraSupreme Court of Missouri · 1895
  4. Viquesney v. City of KansasSupreme Court of Missouri · 1924
  5. Ex Parte Siemens v. ShreeveSupreme Court of Missouri · 1927

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Barhorst v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
  2. Springfield City Water Co. v. City of SpringfieldSupreme Court of Missouri · 1944
  3. Airway Drive-In Theatre Co. v. City of St. AnnSupreme Court of Missouri · 1962
  4. Thunder Oil Company v. City of Sunset HillsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1961
  5. Krug v. Village of Mary RidgeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1954

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API