Legal Opinion

Thunder Oil Company v. City of Sunset Hills

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided July 10, 1961No. 47975PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EAGER, Judge.

In this suit plaintiff seeks to restrain the enforcement of an ordinance and to have it declared void. We shall refer to the parties as they appeared below. Defendant Sunset Hills is a city of the fourth class in St. Louis County. Plaintiff operates a filling station at an important junction of highways within the city limits as, in fact, it did prior to the City’s incorporation in June 1957. The individual defendants are officials of the City and have no personal interest in the matter. The defendant City (and we refer to it when “defendant” is used in the singular) has a…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. A. Magnano Co. v. HamiltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Fox v. Standard Oil Co. of NJSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. Walters v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  4. State ex inf. Major v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1911
  5. Glasgow v. RowseSupreme Court of Missouri · 1869

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Browning-Ferris Industries of Kansas City, Inc. v. DanceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Barhorst v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
  3. Airway Drive-In Theatre Co. v. City of St. AnnSupreme Court of Missouri · 1962
  4. State ex rel. Slah, L.L.C. v. City of Woodson TerraceSupreme Court of Missouri · 2012
  5. Combined Communications Corp. v. City of BridgetonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API