Legal Opinion

Bahl v. Menger (Et Ux.)

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 23, 1925No. Appeal, 286PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

Plaintiff’s bill was for specific performance of a contract for sale of premises No. 1500 North 29th Street, Philadelphia. The agreement was in the form of a lease signed by defendant, Albert C. Menger, as lessor, and contained an option in favor of lessee to purchase the property at any time within five years from its date for the sum of $8,500. Caroline Menger, wife of Albert C. Menger, was not a party to the agreement and at no time consented to it. Plaintiff, within the time specified in the contract, notified appellant he would exercise his option to purchase. Later, plaintiff…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Medoff v. VandersaalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  2. Riesz's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1873
  3. Leafgreen v. LabarSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Auen v. DiCesareSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  2. Bailey v. CooneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  3. Auen v. DiCesareSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API