Behling v. Posorske
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the circuit court for Taylor county: G. N. Risjord, Circuit Judge. Replevin. This action is brought to recover the possession of certain forest products cut and, removed by the defendant from the plaintiff’s land. There was a special verdict.
Read the full summary
Appeal from a judgment of the circuit court for Taylor county: G. N. Risjord, Circuit Judge. Replevin. This action is brought to recover the possession of certain forest products cut and, removed by the defendant from the plaintiff’s land. There was a special verdict. In answer to the first question the court found facts which sustained the plaintiff’s contention in regard to a disputed boundary; found that from the disputed strip the defendant had taken seven cords of pulp'wood, 3,940 feet of logs, and seven and five-tenths cords of bark; that the sheriff seized thirteen and one-half cords…
1Opinion of the CourtRosenberry, J.
The defendant complains that the court erred in answering,,the first question submitted to the jury. *610Upon the trial it appeared that there were three lines, the Logan, the Henry, and the Franzen line. The parties stipulated that one of these three lines was the correct line. After the case had been submitted to the jury, the jury came into court and announced that they had agreed upon the answer to all of the questions submitted excepting the first, which was: “What is the true line between the plaintiff’s land and the northwest quarter of the southwest quarter and the southwest quarter of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Knudson v. GeorgeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1914
- Freed Furniture & Carpet Co. v. SorensenUtah Supreme Court · 1905
- Lanyon v. WoodwardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1886
- St. Paul Boom Co. v. KempWisconsin Supreme Court · 1905
3Cited by3 opinions
- Pleasure Time, Inc. v. KussWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
- Fehrman v. SmirlWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
- Fehrman v. SmirlWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964