Legal Opinion
Ghuman v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
District Court, E.D. California
Decided February 13, 2013No. 1:12-C V-00902-AWI-BAMPublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER RE: MOTION TO DISMISS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
ANTHONY W. ISHII, Senior District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
Defendant Wells Fargo Bank (“Defendant”) has filed a motion to dismiss the First Amended Complaint of plaintiffs Gurvinder Ghuman and Parminder K. Ghuman (“Plaintiffs”) pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). As to Plaintiffs’ third cause of action for violation of California Civil Code Section 2923.5, Defendant seeks a more definite statement of the claim pursuant to Rule 12(e).
FACTS1
On August 29, 2005, Plaintiffs signed a negotiable promissory note (“Note”) in the amount of…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Cel-Tech Communications, Inc. v. Los Angeles Cellular Telephone Co.California Supreme Court · 1999
- Parks School of Business, Inc., Dba Parks College, a New Mexico Corporation v. Fife Symington Roy A. Nicholson Sally HeinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- U.S. Bank Natl. Assn. v. RobinsonOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
- Shirley Wood v. U.S. Bank, et al.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2023
- Hueso v. Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2021
- Kipling v. Carrington Mortgage Services, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2021
- Laurie Nielsen v. United States Department of Housing and Urban Development, Secretary of Housing and Urban Development and Compu-Link CorporationDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2026
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.