Legal Opinion

Pavlik v. St. Paul Mercury Insurance

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided June 9, 1961No. 13236PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

KNOCH, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiffs brought this action against defendant for a declaratory judgment that plaintiffs Roy D. Pavlik, Sr. and Herman G. Lorenz were entitled to coverage under an automobile insurance policy issued by defendant St. Paul Mercury Insurance Company (hereinafter called “St. Paul”) to O’Laughlin Redi-Mix Concrete Company (hereinafter called “O’Laughlin”) with respect to injuries incurred by Ray Shields, an employee of Raymond Concrete Pile Company (hereinafter called “Raymond”). The District Court entered judgment in favor of St. Paul and this appeal followed.

The facts are…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Stammer v. KitzmillerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Coulter v. American Employers' InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1948
  3. American Casualty Co. v. FisherSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
  4. Bituminous Casualty Corp. v. American Fidelity & Casualty Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1959

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Pavlik v. St. Paul Mercury Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API