Legal Opinion

Davis & Rankin Building & Manufacturing Co. v. Hillsboro Creamery Co.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided May 18, 1894No. 1173PublishedCited by 10 opinions

From the Fountain Circuit Court. ,

1Opinion of the CourtLotz, J.

It is averred in the complaint, that David P. Heffner and forty-eight other persons were the promoters of a corporation for the manufacture of cheese and butter; that on the 11th day of August, 1891, Davis and Rankin (a co-partnership) and said promoters entered into a contract in writing, in which it was agreed that Davis and Rankin, as parties of the first part, should build, complete and equip for said promoters, as parties of the second part, a “combined butter and cheese *43factory,” to be located near Hillsboro, Fountain county, Indiana. Said written agreement contains the following…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Whitney v. WymanSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. Stanton v. New York & Eastern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1890
  3. Guaranty Savings & Loan Ass'n v. RutanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Mt. Pleasant Coal Co. v. WattsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1926
  2. Davis & Rankin Building & Manufacturing Co. v. BoothIndiana Court of Appeals · 1894
  3. Waddy Bluegrass Creamery Co. v. Dayis-Rankin Building & Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1898
  4. Cushion Heel Shoe Co. v. HarttIndiana Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Huson v. Portland & Southeastern Railway Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1922

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API