Cushion Heel Shoe Co. v. Hartt
Indiana Supreme Court
Prom Superior Court of Allen County; E. O’Rourke, Special Judge. Action by Obder M. Hartt against the Cushion 1-Ieel Shoe Company. Prom a judgment for plaintiff, the defendant appeals. (Transferred from the Appellate Court under §1405 Burns 1908, Acts 1901 p. 590.)
1Opinion of the CourtSpencer, J.
It appears from the record in this case that in April, 1909, appellee, who was experienced in the manufacture of shoes, inserted in a shoe journal an advertisement for a shoe factory to locate in the city of Pt. Wayne. Among the answers which he received thereto was one from a man named Johnson who was the patentee of a certain cushion heel shoe. Johnson came to Pt. Wayne and with him appellee went to the president of the Commercial Club whom they interested in the proposition of starting appellant company. Subscription lists were prepared and appellee started out to get subscribers to the…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Dickerman v. Northern Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Hayward v. LessonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1900
- Fred Macey Co. v. MaceyMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
- Yale Gas Stove Co. v. WilcoxSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1894
- New York & New Haven Railroad v. KetchumSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1858
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Kirkup v. Anaconda Amusement Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1921
- Henderson v. Plymouth Oil Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1925
- Etgen v. Washington County Building & Loan Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1945
- Hart-Toole Furniture Co. v. ShahanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
- Indianapolis Blue Print & Manufacturing Co. v. KennedyIndiana Supreme Court · 1939
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.