Lunde v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JUNELL, Justice.
Martin Daniel Lunde appeals a conviction for possession of a controlled substance. The jury found the enhancement allegation true and assessed punishment at twelve years incarceration.
In three points of error appellant contends the trial court erred (1) by denying the motion to suppress the heroin seized as a result of an unlawful arrest; (2) by overruling appellant’s objection to the jury charge; and (3) by commenting on the weight of the evidence in the charge. We affirm.
Houston Narcotics Officer Massey testified he received a telephone call from a confidential…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Almanza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
- Brown v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
- Whaley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
- Coleman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982
- Albert v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Lunde v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
- Hennessey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1987
- Lunde v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987